Lecture-concert · FLEXUS PROJECT 5th edition 2025–2026 ·

Towards a
Morphological Composition

Joan Bagés i Rubí
composer, pianist and sound artist · MORPHOSIS Ensemble
www.joanbages.com
Nagoya College of Music · Studio C403
Tuesday 29 September 2026 · 14:40–15:40
Outline · 60 minutes

Six moments

01

Introduction

Background and research trajectory: Barcelona · Paris · Berlin

02

MORPHOSIS Ensemble / Morphosis DUO

A flexible, mixed electroacoustic ensemble from Barcelona, and its duo formation

03

FLEXUS PROJECT

The international project that brings us to Japan

04

Contextual framework

Sound object → spectromorphology → multi-layered composition

05

Research through works

Holophonic composition · the spectromorphological score · the sonorous score

06

Conclusion

Composing relations between morphologies: a typology and a method

To begin · four questions

Questions to listen with

1

Choose one sound. Describe it only by its morphology — never by its cause.

2

How would you notate that shape so another performer finds their own technique for it?

3

When you put two sounds together, what relates them? A shared criterion, a transformation, a superposition, a succession?

4

What would a form look like if it were decided by how the performers play, rather than by the clock?

01 · Introduction
Joan Bagés i Rubí

Joan Bagés i Rubí

composer · pianist · sound artist  ·  www.joanbages.com

His work spans instrumental music, electroacoustic music, sound installations and interactive music systems — not as separate fields, but as a continuum of networks between them.

What unifies it is a permanent research into what he calls “spectro-morphological composition in differentiated layers within a holophonic framework”.

Works performed in many countries and awarded in international competitions · grants and commissions from the Generalitat de Catalunya, Fundació Phonos, INAEM-CDMC and SACEM, among others.

A trajectory between the piano, the studio and the score

BARCELONAPiano diploma, Conservatori del Liceu · Master in Digital Arts – Music, UPF (2002): composition, electroacoustics and interactive systems.
PARISUniversité Paris 8 — DEA and doctorate in Esthétique, sciences et technologies des arts (H. Vaggione, A. Sedes) · composition with J. M. López López. The sound object, the studio, the research.
BERLINComposition studies with Rebecca Saunders: sound as matter, the question of the sound palette, “the weight of every gesture and every silence”.
BARCELONAArtistic director of MORPHOSIS Ensemble; teaching at ESMUC; co-director of Festival Contemporaneus (Reus).

From the very beginning, my creative research has been driven by electronic music as the engine of creation today — not a tool added to the instruments, but the place where sound itself becomes composable.

“In the preparatory work for my composition Kontakte, I found, for the first time, ways to bring all properties [timbre, pitch, intensity and duration] under a single control.”
Karlheinz Stockhausen, “The Concept of Unity in Electronic Music”, Perspectives of New Music 1/1 (1962), p. 40
The research question

How can diverse sounds — simultaneous in time and space, each with its own particularity — be perceived as one unity?

A saxophone key click, a breath, a multiphonic, a processed electronic texture, a light on the floor…

My answer is to compose with morphologies — the shapes of sound — and to let the electronics generate, articulate and fuse them into a global sound.

Nodular stone Dark stone with concretions Crystalline aggregate Wood cross-section
4 → 1 · A NEW ELEMENT THAT DOES NOT EXIST
Invented rock fusing the four
Fusion of the four: grains, nodules, crystals, dark matter and growth rings in one invented stone — heterogeneous parts perceived as one whole.
02 · MORPHOSIS Ensemble / Morphosis DUO

A flexible ensemble for mixed music

Barcelona-based ensemble for mixed electroacoustic music (instruments + electronics), dedicated to new creation. Ten years of activity celebrated in 2024.

No fixed line-up: a variable structure of performers, musicians and artists that changes shape with each project.

Creation as experimental research: very diverse projects on AI, spectromorphology, sonorous scores, new notation and new forms of staging…

Selected projects

MOZART RELOAD (2021) · CAGE RELOAD (2022) · IB: le cornu ancestrale (2022) · FLEXUS PROJECT (2023– ) · L’ESCOLTA MORFOLÒGICA (2024) · satellite groups MORPHOSIS DUO and Morphosis Clarinet Duo

In Japan

JM
Joan Martí-Frasquier
Joan Martí-Frasquier
baritone & alto sax
JB
Joan Bagés i Rubí
Joan Bagés i Rubí
electronics
AT
Anna Tobella
Anna Tobella
mezzo-soprano
XG
Xavier Gelabert
Xavier Gelabert
electronics & voice
MORPHOSIS Ensemble in concert
MORPHOSIS Ensemble in concert — from the IB presentation dossier
MORPHOSIS Ensemble concert, red light
IB: le cornu ancestrale, concert version
03 · FLEXUS PROJECT

An international artistic & research project

FLEXUS — Latin for “bent, flexible”: a project that adapts its format to each place, each partner and each group of students.

We build an international network between countries, and we research by creating: new works exploring new aesthetics and new approaches to sound.

Concerts, lectures, workshops and new works for mixed and electronic music, built together with local composers, performers and schools.

4th edition · 2023–2024

Göteborg (Sweden) · ESMUC, Barcelona · Tartu (Estonia)

5th edition · 2025–2026 · “Morphologies of Sound”

Japan tour with Nagoya College of Music, the Japanese Society for Electronic Music and Tokai University

Japan · September–October 2026

29 SepNagoya College of Music — this lecture + masterclass with composition students
30 SepNagoya — open rehearsal
1 OctNagoya — concert “FLEXUS PROJECT 5th edition: Morphologies of Sound”
3 OctTokyo, MONTEN — concert organised by the Japanese Society for Electronic Music: open and graphic scores
5 OctTokai University — lecture-concert, improvisation with MORPHOSIS DUO, students and teachers
04

Contextual framework

From the sound object to spectromorphology and multi-layered composition

Step 1 · Pierre Schaeffer · the vocabulary

Five concepts to listen with

1 · Reduced listening

Écoute réduite: listening to the sound itself, “while abstracting it from its real or supposed cause, as well as from the meaning it might convey”.

2 · Sound object

What reduced listening perceives: a unit of sound heard for its own qualities — “the equivalent to a unit of breath or articulation, a unit of instrumental gesture”.

3 · Sound morphology

The anatomy of a single sound: the criteria that describe its form — mass, dynamics, timbre, melodic and mass profiles, grain, allure.

4 · Sound sequence

Sound objects chained in time: a succession of articulated morphologies that forms a larger unit — a gesture, a phrase, a path.

5 · Sound web · trame

A sustained texture “in ambient time with constantly changing spectrum” — a stratified sound made of many simultaneous layers.

OBJECT SEQUENCE → time WEB · TRAME ↕ layers

Schaeffer himself: Étude aux chemins de fer (1948), from the Cinq études de bruits · listen online ↗

P. Schaeffer, Traité des objets musicaux (1966) · M. Chion, Guide des objets sonores (1983) · L. Thoresen, “Spectromorphological analysis of sound objects”, Organised Sound 12/2 (2007)

Step 1 · The morphological criteria

Seven ways to describe a sound

  1. 1  Mass — how the sound occupies pitch space
  2. 2  Dynamics — attack and envelope
  3. 3  Harmonic timbre — colour around the mass
  4. 4  Melodic profile — how the mass moves in pitch
  5. 5  Mass profile — how the mass itself changes
  6. 6  Grain — micro-texture of the surface
  7. 7  Allure — the “gait”: vibrato, tremolo, oscillation

In my work the first criterion — mass — becomes a compositional axis.

Schaeffer table criteria 4-7
Criteria 4–7: profiles, grain, allure
Schaeffer table species
“Espèces”: site, calibre, weight, impact, module
Step 1 · Schaeffer's complete map (1/2) · criteria 1–3

Solfège of musical objects

Mass: son pur → tonique → groupe tonique → cannelé → groupe nodal → nœud → frangeGrain
Schaeffer table, criteria 1-3, columns 1-3
CLASSES OF MASS
Schaeffer table, criteria 1-3, columns 4-9
MASS · SPECIES

Schaeffer's effort

From the first études de bruits (1948) to the Traité (1966): almost twenty years of studio research to build a solfège for all sounds — a way to describe any sound by what we hear, not by its source or its notation. First sort (typology), then describe (morphology), with 7 criteria × levels of description. This table (TARSOM) is the synthesis.

The 7 classes of mass

  1. 1 Son pur — no harmonics: a sine-like sound
  2. 2 Tonique — one fixed, recognisable pitch: the note
  3. 3 Groupe tonique — several tonic sounds heard together: a chord
  4. 4 Cannelé — tonic and nodal at once: a pitch emerging from a noisy band
  5. 5 Groupe nodal — several nodal sounds: pitch regions heard together
  6. 6 Nœud — a pitch region, not a note
  7. 7 Frange — a band of noise, coloured by register

From the note to the noise: the axis of all my scores.

P. Schaeffer, Traité des objets musicaux (1966): Tableau récapitulatif du solfège des objets musicaux · columns 1–3: types, classes, genres · columns 4–9: species (pitch, intensity, duration) · click to zoom

Step 1 · Schaeffer's complete map (2/2) · criteria 4–7

Variations & sustainment

Mass: son pur → tonique → groupe tonique → cannelé → groupe nodal → nœud → frangeGrain
Schaeffer table, criteria 4-7, columns 1-3
GRAIN
Schaeffer table, criteria 4-7, columns 4-9
GRAIN · SPECIES

Rows 4–5: variations (melodic profile, mass profile) · rows 6–7: entretien, sustainment (grain, allure) · click to zoom

Step 1 · Listening · the classes of mass

From the pure sound to the fringe

Pure sound son pur

A sound without harmonics: a sine wave.

Tonic sound son tonique

A fixed, recognisable pitch — the “note”.

Fluted / rippled son cannelé

A tonic sound with internal movement: vibrato, tremolo, frullato.

Nodal group groupe nodal

Groups of sounds whose final pitch is hard to identify.

Node nœud / son nodal

A sound with a pitch “region” but no clear note.

Fringe son frange

Air, friction, distortion: a rich band of noise we can colour.

Pure sound: electronic sine wave · other recordings: French horn, Duo Atem — morphological sound bank of Cicada Killer (2024–26). Spectrograms: logarithmic frequency.

Step 1c · Grain · the granularity of sound matter

Sound as particles

Perception. For Schaeffer the grain is the micro-texture of a sound’s surface — frémissement, fourmillement; rugueux, mat, lisse. We do not hear the single events: we hear a texture with a density, a size and a colour of grain.

Granular synthesis. Sound built from thousands of tiny grains of about 1–100 ms. Gabor (1947): sound as “acoustic quanta”. Xenakis: “all sound… is conceived as an assemblage of a large number of elementary sounds” (Analogique A-B, 1959). Roads: first computer implementation (1974), Microsound (2001). Truax: real time (1986).

My influences

Horacio Vaggione (Córdoba, 1943 · Université Paris 8, my DEA supervisor): micro-time, object-based composition across time scales — Schall (1995).
José Manuel Berenguer (Barcelona, 1955 · Orquestra del Caos, my teacher in Barcelona): the studio as a laboratory of sound matter.
José Manuel López López (Madrid, 1956 · Université Paris 8, my composition teacher): “the scientific and philosophical nature of sound” — time, spectrum and electronics in the instrumental writing.

grains (1–100 ms) stream · density · rhythm cloud · a new timbre

In my music · grain and granular synthesis

1 · acoustic grain, amplified

2 · real-time granulation of the instruments

3 · a granular cloud

From the acoustic grain of the instrument to the synthetic grain of the electronics: the same morphology at two scales — which is why they fuse.

Step 1b · Rebecca Saunders · the sound palette

A palette of sounds

“From this sound, I created what I call a palette of sounds. If you imagine a painter… he will have his palette of colours.”

A very reduced palette “shaved carefully off the potential sound mass of the ensemble”, each sound “carefully balanced with the surrounding silence” — sounds “that meet the borders of noise and of silence”.

The palette is built with the performers, close to “the physical reality of the instruments’ core sounds”: “the weight of the bow on the string; the differentiation of touch of the finger on the piano key”.

Opposing palettes: “very loud, rhythmic, aggressive sounds” against “tender, quiet, static sounds”.

Rebecca Saunders (London, 1967 · lives in Berlin) · studied with Wolfgang Rihm · Ernst von Siemens Music Prize 2019 · my composition teacher in Berlin

How one sound is built · its morphological mechanics (schematic)

bow speedbow pressurecontact pointvibratoresulting spectrum sul ponticello · flautatoordinario

“A single tone with different bow speeds, from half a second to 32 seconds, consequently varying bow pressure and speed, focusing in on varying overtone spectrums” — every parameter is notated, often with detailed text annotations.

One pitch, many sounds · Fury II (2009–10), mm. 35–40

F♯4 as a timbre melody → bass clarinetm. 35 piano harmonicscluster bass · sul pont.flautato bass · ordinario+ vibrato accordion · tam-tamresonance, mm. 46–51 the same pitch changes body, grain and spectrum — the morphology moves, the note stays

Listen / see (online): Fury II, PHACE ↗ · Enno Senft shows the sounds of Fury II ↗

Step 1b · Rebecca Saunders · the palette in the score

Molly’s Song 3 – shades of crimson (1995–96) · viola, alto flute, steel-string guitar, 4 radios, music-box

Molly's Song 3, rehearsal 36 12345678
Sound object A · 1 3 4 6 7 — impact → resonanceSound object B · 2 5 8 — breath, air, glide

Explanatory notes (viola · alto flute · guitar): every sound of the palette has its own symbol and instruction. Click to read.

legend viola legend alto flute guitar legend guitar

Rehearsal 36 · how each sound is built

Three instruments, one sound object that transforms: A (1·3·4·6·7), then B (2·5·8).

  1. 1Viola · LH slam + pizz chords
    “slam down LH onto fingerboard for maximum dynamic ‘wood’ accent” · pizzicato four-note chords “from above, non arpeggio, percussive and loud”, then glissando f → ff → sff
  2. 2Viola · arco ½SP, pp
    “near SP, touch of colour of SP, written tone dominates klangfarbe” — then a slow move towards sul tasto
  3. 3Alto flute · harmonic from silence
    harmonic, “always dark and in strong contrast to ordinary tone” · crescendo from silence to pp
  4. 4Alto flute · fluttertongue arpeggio + key slaps
    “with fluttertongue arpeggio up the harmonic series as fast, high and loud as possible. Bring out the distortion” · key slaps sff
  5. 5Alto flute · AIR
    “air tone at fingered pitch, written pitch is audible” · crescendo to ff
  6. 6Guitar · SP, thumb → nail
    between sound-hole and bridge (“white klangfarbe”) · harmonics, bar chord at 4th fret · the finger changes the colour: thumb → nail, pp → ff
  7. 7Guitar · plectrum chord
    hard plectrum, sff: an attack that closes the gesture
  8. 8Guitar · metal bottle-neck
    MB-N, chord at 17th fret with plectrum sff · “gliss immediately!” (natural dim.) · then slower gliss

Listen (online): SoundCloud ↗ · YouTube ↗

Step 2 · Denis Smalley

Spectromorphology

Spectrum (what the sound is made of) + morphology (how it is shaped in time).

A way to describe sounds in motion: how a spectrum is born, lives and dies, and how sounds relate to each other.

References

D. Smalley, “Spectro-morphology and structuring processes” (1986) · “Spectromorphology: explaining sound-shapes”, Organised Sound 2/2 (1997)

In my music · a spectrum changing in time

SPECTRAL TYPOLOGY — A CONTINUUM notenodenoise pure · tonicnodal · canneléfrange MORPHOLOGY — ONSET · CONTINUANT · TERMINATION attack–decaygraduated swellanacrusis → accent MOTION & GROWTH PROCESSES ascent · descent · oscillation · rotation · dilation · contraction · accumulation · dissipation
Step 3 · Panayiotis Kokoras · holophonic musical texture

Holophony: the whole made of sounds

“The synthesis of simultaneous sound streams into a coherent whole with internal components and focal points.”

Greek holos (whole) + phōnē (sound). Not the acoustic “holophony” of holography: a musical texture.

Historical concept

A new stage in the history of texture, after monophony, polyphony and homophony — emerging from around 1950 with Xenakis (Pithoprakta, 1955–56) and Ligeti’s micropolyphony. It rests on perception: Schaeffer’s sound object, Risset’s spectral fusion, McAdams’ fusion/fission, Bregman’s auditory streams.

Current concept · in his music

“Each independent sound (φωνή) contributes equally into the synthesis of the total (ὅλος)” — a virtuosity of sound. In Holophony for string quartet (2002–03) the result is “a single abstract sound with internal components and with focal points”.

A HISTORY OF MUSICAL TEXTURE Monophony Polyphony Homophony Holophony internal components · focal points · one whole

Articles

“Towards a Holophonic Musical Texture”, ICMC Barcelona (2005) · Journal of Music and Meaning (2007)
“Auditory fusion and holophonic musical texture in Xenakis’ Pithoprakta”, ICMC Athens (2014)
“Morphopoiesis: a general procedure for structuring form” (2005)

Listen (online)

Holophony (2003) for string quartet, with score ↗ · SoundCloud ↗

Step 3 · Multi-layered composition

Layers that fuse into a global sound

Heterogeneous morphologies are composed in layers — acoustic, amplified, electronic, spatial, visual — which are perceived together as one sound: holophony.

The mixture of acoustic and electronic sound opens an unusual timbral and morphological richness: the instrument extends into the electronics, the electronics take on the body of the instrument.

The challenge

To compose the interactions between the layers — and how they evolve in time.

Morphologicallistening · Schaeffer Holophoniclistening · Kokoras Spectrallistening · Smalley MY CONCEPT Spectro-morphological musical composition in differentiated layers LAYERS IN INTERACTION · OVER TIME → instrumentcontact micelectronicsspacelight · voice each layer keeps its particularity · the composition is written in their interactions
From theory to works

Some creative examples — among many other works

A · Holophonic composition

How layers fuse into one sound

LHC

bass flute & three snare drums · 2010

HOLOFONIA v1

baritone saxophone & electronics · 2015

IB: le cornu ancestrale

electroacoustic opera · 2022

B · The spectromorphological score

How to notate a morphology

PUNTS DE LLUM A LES ALES DELS INSECTES

bass clarinet, microtonal accordion & electronics · 2012

CICADA KILLER

horn, trombone, electronics & light · 2024–26

C · The sonorous score

When the score is a sound

MATAR EL SOL

ensemble, electronics & video · 2014

05 · Research through works
A

Holophonic composition

LHC · HOLOFONIA v1 · IB: le cornu ancestrale

A · LHC · amplified bass flute & three amplified snare drums · Paris 2010

Collision creates matter

LHC = the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland, built to study the origin of matter. The piece “creates and accelerates matter and particles”.

The collision of two realities — the raw sound of the bass flute and the percussion — generates figures, lines, accumulations.

A work built on a sound palette and on the morphology of grain: brushes, nails and fingers on granular drum heads, frullato and jeu voilé on the flute — an analogue granular synthesis, made by hand.

“The most important thing is a balance where the sum of the two instruments generates a new instrument, heard through the loudspeakers.”

LHC performance: bass flute and snare drums
LHC in performance — bass flute and three snare drums

Amplification as a sound microscope

The only electronics is amplification — two stereo positions + the centre. It enlarges the grain like a microscope, and the fusion happens in the loudspeakers: holophony without a computer.

A · LHC · notation of granular matter
LHC score page 1
Score, page 1 · amplified bass flute + snare drums 1, 2, 3

Snare drums as fields

SD1 piccolo and SD2 large, both with granular heads, divided into 9 zones (1 = upper rim · 5 = centre · 9 = lower rim). SD3 upside down: played on the snares.

Brushes (jazz / dreadlock), nails, fingers: vertical and circular rubbing, speeds 1-2-3.

Bass flute

Highest possible sound · speaking consonants (SK, PR) · singing and playing · frullato · jeu voilé · richest multiphonic · slap · long gliss.

LHC flute notation legend
Legend for the bass flute (from the performance notes)
A · HOLOFONIA v1 · baritone saxophone & electronics (SMI) · Flix/Paris 2015 · for Joan Martí-Frasquier · ≈10′

A microscope for the ear

The contrast between the large, dense and loud (the exterior, the super-structure) and the infinitely small: microscopic life that resists, fragile and unstable.

The saxophonist places tiny sounds and gestures in front of the audience “as if through a microscope”.

Amplification as a sound microscope: the contact microphone enlarges key clicks, friction and pads until they become musical material — “not anecdotal nor theatrical, but musical”.

“HOLOFONIA is a concept that refers to the construction of a global, unitary sound, based on disparate and opposed morphologies which function as a WHOLE.”

Joan Martí-Frasquier and Joan Bagés performing Holofonia
Joan Martí-Frasquier (baritone sax) and Joan Bagés (electronics)

Set-up

DPA microphone in the bell · contact microphone on the body (keys, friction, pads) · Max/MSP Interactive Musical System (SMI) · MIDI pedal to trigger presets · stereo or quadraphonic

A · HOLOFONIA v1 · the sound palette

Small sounds, treated musically

“These sounds are not anecdotal nor theatrical, but musical: it is a sonic microscope, and they must sound at a more than reasonable volume.”

  • key clicks — closing and opening, low / middle / high keys
  • finger dragged on a key: a creaking door → a nodal sound
  • pads slowly unstuck: a “velcro” sound
  • slaps (percussive, with air), kisses on the reed, teeth on the reed
  • eolian sounds, so nodal: “between air, note and breaking”
  • multiphonics (D. Kientzy fingerings) and filtered vowels in the crook

Listen · contact microphone: finger dragged on the keys

The electronic part = four banks of saxophone sounds

A

Articulations

F

Phrases

P

Percussive

N

Notes / sustained frequency

Recorded with saxophonist Joshua Hyde from my own pieces, plus an improvisation by Mats Gustafsson recorded in Flix.

A · HOLOFONIA v1 · compositional process: structure & matter
Sketch: structure, compression in time
Structure sketch — morphologies (nodal, tonic, articulations) on a time axis; “compression”
Sketch: epidermis, material
Matter: “epidermis”, grains
Sketch nodal
Nodal forces
Sketch section 1
Section 1
Sketch section 2
Section 2
A · HOLOFONIA v1 · score, section 1.1

Two staves: saxophone + presets

Upper staff: the saxophone. Lower line: the number of the preset fired with the MIDI pedal, and what it does musically.

Section 1.1: “Nodal sounds interrupted by multiphonics which lead to brief objects of diverse morphologies.”

1 Frase · 2 Tractament frase · 3 Articulació · stop frases · 4 Frase · 5 Artic. · 6 Artic. · stop frase + nova frase + pur…

6 sections · the morphologies appear and mix over time. The embouchure is removed and replaced many times: a difficult, permanent change of state.

Holofonia v1.1 score page 1
Click to zoom · “So nodal: indefinite sound, between air, note and breaking, with smorzando: teeth on the reed”
A · HOLOFONIA v1.1 · listening · Joan Martí-Frasquier, baritone saxophone

One sound, many morphologies

Listen for

When do you stop hearing “saxophone + electronics” and start hearing one sound?

Look at

The spectrogram: vertical columns = attacks and key clicks; horizontal lines = tonic sounds; clouds = nodal and frange.

Suggested excerpts

Opening (0:00–0:50) · 1:45–2:40 · 8:20–9:10 · click the markers or the spectrogram to jump.

A · IB: LE CORNU ANCESTRALE · electroacoustic opera in concert format · MORPHOSIS Ensemble · 2022

Water as a metaphor of existence

10 musicians, 2 soloists (Anna Tobella, mezzo-soprano · Roger Padullés, tenor), electroacoustic choir, electronic music and visuals · conductor Àlex Sansó.

“Opera” in its etymological sense — opus, a musical work — without theatrical representation: sound and image take the space, including the audience, surrounded by an acousmonium (orchestra of loudspeakers).

Six mental landscapes, from the question where do we come from? to death and the return to the whole. Two characters, H and O — together, the drop of water.

IB: a syllable at the origin of many Iberian words — the whole, the origin, the drop of water.

IB poster
IB · poster
IB visual
Visuals (Belén Oniesta, after Jaume Rocamora)
IB concert
Concert with projections
IB visual 2
Visual material of the opera

Listen · spectromorphological composition in differentiated layers (online)

▶ IB — complete opera ↗ · Scene 0 — the space before everything ↗ · Scene 2 ↗ · Scene 6 (Barcelona Clàssica) ↗ · Teaser ↗ · Live in Luxembourg (Bandcamp) ↗

Listen for the layers: voices + instruments + electronic choir + acousmonium space — each keeps its morphology, together they form one sound.

A · IB · superposition of morphological layers (1/2)
IB score p. 25 · bars 82–86
p. 25 · bars 82–86Stratification
Winds — tonic sounds with air and slow undulation — cannelé (“more note than air”)
Percussion · piano — isolated impulses with long resonance (L.V.) — attack → resonance
Accordion — one sustained tonic with vibrato — allure
Electroacoustic choir — long vowels “d’aigua”, “sura” — tonic group, slow melodic profile
Strings — harmonics, tremolo, sul ponticello pp → mf — nodal grain

A sustained tonic fabric (choir, accordion) under a sparse layer of impulses and grain: distinct layers, focal points on each attack.

IB score p. 69 · bars 254–258
p. 69 · bars 254–258Fusion into one granular mass
Flute — iterated consonants “t k sh” — iterative, noisy articulations
Clarinet · saxophone · strings — trills and multiphonics — cannelé (tonic with fast allure)
Accordion · cello · bass — long low pedal — tonic, homogeneous
Soloists · electroacoustic choir — fast repeated syllables “n”, “m-eh” — dense iterative grain
Percussion · piano — rolls and repeated high notes — iteration

Every layer iterates at a different speed over one low pedal: the iterations fuse into a single cannelé mass.

IB score p. 108 · bars 409–412
p. 108 · bars 409–412Transformation of the mass
Tutti — short staccato impulses f — then silence (fermata)
Clarinet · saxophone — low held tones moving to multiphonic (→ M) — tonic → complex
Strings — long notes, ordinario → molto sul ponticello — mass profile: tonic → nodal
Voices — sustained tone and trill, then repeated notes “El cos i les…” — tonic → iterative
Vibraphone · piano · accordion — fast cluster-arpeggios, then high repeated notes — grain emerging

From impulses to sustained sounds: the sustained layer changes its mass while an iterative layer emerges above it.

A · IB · superposition of morphological layers (2/2)
IB score p. 124 · bars 461–464
p. 124 · bars 461–464Masking and emergence
Upper group · accordion — continuous 32nd-note iteration, ff ↔ p — a granular trame
Strings — x-noteheads, iterative noise, p — frange grain
Piano — low tremolo glissandi — nodal, moving mass
Mezzo · tenor — melodic line “Ma-ssa-cre” with trills — tonic figure

The voices emerge from a granular frange that swells and recedes (ff ↔ p): the tonic figure is alternately masked and revealed.

IB score p. 148 · bars 546–549
p. 148 · bars 546–549Dissolution
Flute — glissandi over harmonics, p < f > p — partials sweeping: allure of the spectrum
Accordion · double bass · xylophone — sustained cluster, bass S.T., xylophone tremolo — static tonic group
Electroacoustic choir — spoken text “Encara ressona el corn del sirgador…” mp — a thin voiced layer
Violin 1 — expressive line ppp → mf — the only melodic profile

A static sustained field, a sweeping harmonic layer and a thin line of text: few layers, much space — the fabric dissolves around one focal point.

05 · Research through works
B

The spectromorphological score

PUNTS DE LLUM A LES ALES DELS INSECTES · CICADA KILLER

B · A new kind of graphic score

Notating the shape, not the note

A graphic score based on Schaeffer’s sound morphologies and on the visual language of the spectrogram, to show the performer the sound materials to play.

Each performer searches, on their own instrument, the equivalent of each morphology: the technique is theirs to find.

A wide margin of freedom and action for the performer — while the control of form stays with the composer.

Fixed / open

Composermorphology of each section, gestures, registers, order of pages, dynamic relationships, form
Performerthe technique that embodies each morphology, articulation, tempo within a margin
Electronicstransformation in real time, samples, and (in Cicada Killer) the form itself

Recommended reading for performers: M. Chion, Guide des objets sonores · P. Schaeffer, Traité des objets musicaux.

B · PUNTS DE LLUM A LES ALES DELS INSECTES · bass clarinet, microtonal accordion & electronics · Paris 2012 · Festival Eufònic

« Parlo d’un lent crepuscle que posava
or tremolós a l’aigua amorosida,
punts de llum a les ales dels insectes,
solars reflectiments als ponts llunyans »

Gerard Vergés (Tortosa, 1931–2014)

“I speak of a slow twilight that laid trembling gold on the softened water, points of light on the wings of insects…”

A granular work inspired by the sound matter of the Ebro Delta: insects, tiny noises, indeterminate sounds — a metaphor of attentive listening, a whisper.

“Points of light on the wings of insects” — illustration

Electronics · Max/MSP

3 inputs (accordion ×2, clarinet) · real-time delay + pitch shift and granulation · 29 presets of fixed samples (space bar or USB pedal) · 3 faders on a nanoKONTROL2: an electronic performer mixes live, following the score.

B · PUNTS DE LLUM · page A

How to read a page

  • Tempo and Dynamics: relative curves
  • Clarinet: events in time and register (vertical lines = attacks, dashed levels = register)
  • M.P.S. — mode of sound production: • note · M multiphonic · keys · air · frullato…
  • Morfol. — the morphology symbol: tonic, variable tonic, complex, nodal, fringe…
  • ELECTR. — delay on/off, sample tracks (“Pista 1: tonic variable”)
  • Ac. M.D. / Ac. M.E. — accordion right / left hand, each with register and morphology
Punts de llum score page A
Click to zoom · “Tònic molt variable” · “Complex → Mult.” · “[Delay ON]”
B · PUNTS DE LLUM · listening with the score

Follow the page, not the notes

Watch how the morphology lane announces the sound before you hear it. The performers’ techniques are their own — the shapes are the composer’s.

The three layers

1 · acoustic (clarinet + accordion)
2 · real-time electronics (delay/pitch, granulation)
3 · fixed electronics (samples)

Recording with synchronised score · 6′50″

B · CICADA KILLER · horn, trombone, electronics & light · Flix–Stockholm–Barcelona 2024–26 · Duo Atem (Sören Hermansson, Ivo Nilsson)

A reactive sound ecosystem

The cicada and the wasp that preys on it — Sphecius speciosus, the “cicada killer”. The wasp does not kill: it paralyses the cicada and stores it alive for its larva. A cycle interrupted but not finished — an image of our relation with the planet.

Cicada · cycle intact

pure and tonic sounds

Predator · collapse

nodal and frange sounds

NEW IN MY RESEARCH · INTERACTIVE MUSIC & AI

The system listens and learns to take formal decisions, relating the morphological materials in real time. The form is no longer fixed: it emerges from performance.

It opens onto my current research in interactive music composition — beyond the scope of this lecture.

Cicada Killer score cover with wasp drawing
Score cover
B · CICADA KILLER · six sections, six morphologies
Cicada Killer A1
A · emergence — pure → tonic
Cicada Killer B1
B · cannelé — vibrato, tremolo, frullato
Cicada Killer C1
C · nodal group and node
Cicada Killer D1
D · frange — air, friction, distortion
Cicada Killer living ecosystem page
LIVING ECOSYSTEM — open last page of each section
Cicada Killer E
E · decrease or bifurcation · F · dissolution

The thickness, texture and colour of the line indicate the morphology · tempo and dynamics are relative · green blocks = contact microphone · bottom lanes = “Morphology electronic” and “Elec. music”.

B · CICADA KILLER · one description for music and light

Each section is a point in a 7-dimensional space

densitynoiseattackwidthmovementtempodynamics
A · pure/tonic0.100.050.050.150.100.250.30
B · cannelé0.400.400.350.450.950.550.55
C · nodal/nœud0.650.400.850.550.350.550.70
D · frange0.950.950.900.950.200.750.80
E · decrease0.250.300.100.400.250.350.25
E · bifurcation0.450.500.500.500.700.500.60
F · dissolution0.150.700.000.300.150.250.10

From cicada-seccions.json — the single file that drives the decisions and the light. Frullato counts as noise, not movement; D does not undulate, it breaks; F = air without sound (noise 0.70, density 0.15).

Listen · instrumental material per section

30″ excerpts from the section sound files of the electronic part (instrumental sounds structured by morphology).

B · CICADA KILLER · the loop the performers are inside
Horn + trombone4 mics: clip + contactread the projected score Analysissigmund~ · bonk~ · 7 bands5 descriptors, 10× / s Decision enginemarkov-cicada.jswhen? · which section? Score pagessection A–F projected Electronics = habitat12 samplers · 5 banks · quad Light = colony150 LEDs · Arduino THE PERFORMERS STEER THE FORM BY HOW THEY PLAY electronics analysed separately

Five descriptors

density (inter-onset interval) · noise (spectral flatness) · attack · internal movement · dynamics

Nine rules, among them

  • A, B, C, D happen exactly once; F always closes
  • at least 1 minute of listening before any decision
  • E may return (max. twice), never twice in a row
  • turning the last page forces the change
  • never longer than 30 minutes
300

valid paths through the piece

10–19′

median duration, depending on how they play

“A duo that stagnates provokes changes; a duo that develops the material makes the system wait.”

B · CICADA KILLER · the cicada and its predator, measured

Spectral flatness

Geometric mean ÷ arithmetic mean of 7 octave bands (100 Hz – 6.4 kHz). It measures whether the energy is concentrated or spread — not where it is.

clean note (2 bands)0.065noise 0.00
note with frullato0.449noise 0.11
air and friction0.990noise 1.00

Unlike a high-frequency ratio, a clean high note still reads as tonic.

B · CICADA KILLER · the light is a third performer

150 individuals

A 5-metre strip of 150 LEDs on the floor: a population of coupled oscillators (Kuramoto model). Order parameter r: 1 = the whole population moves together · 0 = scattered.

horn · 0–47contact zone · 48–102trombone · 103–149 1.60 m · 1.83 m · 1.57 m
  • each instrument owns a territory; brightness follows what it plays
  • the two colonies touch only in the contact zone
  • the colony senses a change before it happens: it becomes restless and loses unison
  • tonic electronics → the scene firms up; frange → everything dims and trembles
LED colony test · studio, Flix
Synchrony and dispersion
05 · Research through works
C

The sonorous score

MATAR EL SOL · when the score is a sound in the performer’s ears

C · MATAR EL SOL · violin, cello, bass clarinet, electric guitar, electronics & video · Paris 2014 · for Nou Ensemble

From the electric to the acoustic

Performers wear headphones. A Max/MSP patch sends them, in real time, a stream of disparate electronic sounds built on sound morphologies.

Overwhelmed by information, they have one option: SELECT — and translate what they hear, with minimum delay, into acoustic energy on their instrument. First impression → reaction; then they can travel inside the sound.

“Composition with a sonorous score speaks of the transformation of one energy into another.”

NEW IN MY RESEARCH · THE COGNITION OF SOUND

The piece also speaks of how we perceive and recognise sounds, and which attributes we give them.

Theme: electricity. Victory over the Sun (1913 — Kruchenykh, Matyushin, Malevich): to “kill the sun” is to replace natural light with electric light.

Matar el sol performance with projections
Nou Ensemble performing Matar el sol
Matar el sol projection
Video projections
C · MATAR EL SOL · three zones and a virtual score
ZONE 1 · BACK OF THE STAGE E-guitar cello bass clarinet violin ZONE 2 · FRONT · A NETWORK OF 30 MP3 PLAYERS fragments of “cut reality”, 1–10 s, overlapping — a continuous electric flow, very soft ZONE 3 · CONTROL · MAX/MSP (5th performer) 1 · records the performers in real time and redistributes their sound2 · fires 5 electronic sequences × 4 files to the headphones3 · follows a virtual score: between randomness and control

The virtual score · 6 moments

  1. 1 Cello alone in Zone 1, puts on headphones
  2. 2 The others switch on all the mp3s, listen, enter one by one → superposition → concentration towards one point
  3. 3 From one point to all musicians → sound network
  4. 4 Sudden cut: composed sequences in the big headphones → another gesture, another listening
  5. 5 Back and forth between the composed and the live network
  6. 6 Minute 11: all share the same material; they return to the mp3s and switch them off one by one — the electric guitar ends
C · MATAR EL SOL · what the performers hear, and what we see

Nou Ensemble · excerpt (33″)

Matar el sol Max/MSP patch
The Max/MSP patch · version 5: 5 sequences × 4 files

In the headphones · electronic sequences

Imagine you must translate this, right now, on your violin. What do you choose?

06 · Conclusion · the result of the research

What is composed is the relation

In spectro-morphological composition in differentiated layers, materials are not enough: what is composed is how morphological and spectral materials relate — from the object to the whole work — and how these relations change in time.

How many ways are there to relate morphologies?
How do we compose those relations?

From the theoretical frame to the relation

Schaeffer
sound object · morphology
what relates: objects and their criteria
Vaggione · López López · Berenguer
grain · micro-time
relations inside the sound
Rebecca Saunders
sound palette
a finite set of sounds whose relations are composed
Smalley
spectromorphology · behaviour
relations in time: coordination, causality, dominance, coexistence
Kokoras
holophony
relations that produce one whole with focal points
06 · Conclusion · relations at every scale

From the object to the work

One question at every level: how does morphological and spectral material relate — inside a sound, between sounds, between sections?

OBJECTms – sone sound: mass, grain, allure, profile
SEQUENCEsobjects chained in time
TRAMEs – minobjects superposed into one stratified fabric
PHRASEs – minsequences and trames articulated into a directed gesture
SECTIONmina dominant morphology and its field of relations
WORKthe wholethe path between sections: a trajectory in morphological space
06 · Conclusion · a typology of morphological relations

How morphologies relate

CONTINUITY

materials share a criterion

Identity
same class of mass, same grain
Variation
one criterion changes, the others stay
Kinship
different sounds, same spectral region or grain type

TRANSFORMATION

one morphology becomes another

Passage
note → node → noise along the mass axis
Densification
grains → stream → cloud
Dissolution
the spectrum thins into air, into silence

SUPERPOSITION

morphologies at the same time

Fusion
they merge into one object
Stratification
a trame with distinct layers and focal points
Masking / emergence
one hides or reveals another

ARTICULATION

morphologies in succession

Causality
an attack produces a resonance
Chaining
the end of one object is the onset of the next
Cut / contrast
opposed palettes side by side

The same process works at every time scale.

Inside one object · milliseconds
grains densify into a cloud within a single sound
Between objects · seconds
one sound densifies into a trame, a phrase dissolves into air
Between sections · minutes
a whole section densifies, or dissolves into the next
06 · Conclusion · composing a relation

A relation is written with criteria

  • Shared criterion — mass, grain, allure, dynamic or melodic profile, spectral region
  • Distance — how far two morphologies are on those criteria
  • Degree — from fusion to contrast
  • Direction — which morphology leads, which follows or is caused
  • Coordination — tight ↔ loose, in simultaneity and in succession
  • Scale — object · sequence · trame · phrase · section · work

A relation evolves in time · two morphologies on the mass axis

puretoniccannelénodalnodefrange time →

━ morphology 1   ┅ morphology 2 — when the lines meet: fusion; when they separate: contrast; when one follows the other: causality.

06 · Conclusion · what I propose

How to compose in differentiated layers

A method in six steps, from the choice of the materials to the perception of the whole.

The sounds are chosen once; the relations are composed all the way through.

1
Define a palette
a finite set of sound objects described by their morphological and spectral criteria
2
Choose the scales
where the relations will act: object, sequence, trame, phrase, section, work
3
Choose the relations
continuity, transformation, superposition, articulation — and their shared criteria
4
Write their trajectories
how each relation moves between fusion and contrast over time
5
Notate morphologies and relations
a spectromorphological score: the shape and its relations are written; the performer finds the technique
6
Listen to the whole
verify that the differentiated layers are perceived as one holophonic sound
FLEXUS PROJECT · 5th edition · Morphologies of Sound

Thank you

Joan Bagés i Rubí · joanbir@hotmail.com · www.joanbages.com

MORPHOSIS Ensemble · morphosisensemble.com

Concert · 1 October · Nagoya College of Music  ·  Open rehearsal · 30 September

00:00
Speaker notes · N to close